In an effort to reduce the calorie content of food, nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) provide an alternative that helps sate sugar cravings. Despite their popular use in food and drink, several knowledge gaps remain, such as the potential impact of NNS on appetite, and the links between sex, obesity, and appetite responses to NNS versus other nutritive sweeteners. In this randomized, crossover clinical trial, Yunker et al. (2021) investigated the resultant neural activity from several high-caloric food cues (sweet and savory), metabolic reactions, and changes in feeding patterns following administration of sucralose (NNS), sucrose (nutritive sugar) or water (control) in a population of 74 healthy adults (43 women, 31 men, average age 23.4 ± 3.96 years). Following a 12-hour overnight fast, study participants gave three timed blood draws after receiving either water or a drink containing sucralose or sucrose. Neural activity was evaluated with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), and blood samples were used to investigate plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon-like peptide (7-36), acyl-ghrelin, total peptide YY, and leptin. The results showed that sucrose ingestion induced higher circulating glucose levels, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1, and curbed acyl-ghrelin levels, compared to sucralose. Furthermore, participants with an obese BMI classification displayed more predilection to savory food cues, seen through higher medial frontal and orbitofrontal cortical reactivity (MFC, OFC, respectively) after ingesting sucralose. Female participants in particular displayed greater MFC and OFC reactivity to high-caloric foods and sweet foods, and consumed more total calories after ingesting sucralose compared to male participants, who did not show any differences with either sucralose or sucrose. To conclude, the authors highlight that their findings demonstrate a marked vulnerability of obese and female populations to heterogeneous neural reactivity following sucralose ingestion compared to sucrose ingestion.
|